Huge respect to @yassin104 @Abdourahamane_ @TENGSOABA @d4rk51d3 @Ammart90 @vaderyang @NightJ @cyberkid_001 @snazon @JunbiaoLu @LiQizhe the folks sitting at the top of the leaderboard with 0.90+ and 1.0 scores!
Seeing scores this high on Day 1 makes me wonder if I'm completely overcomplicating things.
I have two questions for the community:
Would love to hear your thoughts! Good luck everyone.
Hey @Yisakberhanu ,
I’m just starting on this challenge and honestly had the exact same confusion from your post. Seeing 0.90+ scores with my below average performance is a bit demoralizing.
I noticed you later broke into the 0.9+ range yourself, which is impressive. Was it mostly better agent design/prompting, or did you realize the data was simpler than it first looked?
Welcome, great man. This time we are competing with perfect gods; we have to compete with gods anyway. My score is heavily invested data, but still I have not even reached perfect. My concern is that perfect in ML is always impossible, even reaching .95, so unless the data contains a leak or the top prefect team has extraordinary power to see what we cannot see, there is no way to score heavily invested data. This is what I can tell you. But we have to learn from the top prefect team. This time I am eager to see the perfect team's solution at the end of the competition. You may reach the perfect score soon. Good luck. Now I feel like I am stupid, okay?
I see. Thanks for the feedback. Let see